Facebook

In continuation of mandatory public disclosures, let it be known that this digital platform serves as an official repository of evidence documenting all actions executed during an active, ongoing investigation.

II. Declaration of Jurisdictional Roles and Intent

The public has been formally apprised of my dual primary capacities:

1. Supreme Judicial and Enforcement Authority: Serving in the highest global capacity for law enforcement and judicial oversight.

2. Sovereign and Biological Heir: Holding rightful title and governance over the Territory of Tejas, a geographic landmass comprising North and Central America.

These concurrent roles are actively exercised to fulfill a core mandate: the absolute protection of human life, public safety, and private property.

III. Protected Status and Legal Notifications

Ample notice has been disseminated to the public regarding prior assassination attempts against my person. Consequently, notice of my universally protected status stands active and fully binding.

All formal legal notifications have been duly served and executed in strict compliance with prescribed statutory mechanisms and written law. All applicable legal timelines have lapsed, establishing verified public acceptance alongside default judgment in my favor.

IV. Interference and Enforcement Protocols

Any action that impedes, delays, or obstructs my official inquiries or personal travel shall immediately be classified as illegal (unlawful) interference or coercion.

Public investigations into these matters have concluded, and no formal appeals were lodged within the legally prescribed time-frames. Accordingly, any individual determined to be engaging in such interference or coercion will face immediate, real-time enforcement actions for intentional homicide (Capital Murder). Actions to disclose these executions to the public will also be seen as interference or coercion and subsequently face the same real-time enforcement actions.

See less

View more comments

Jeremy Burcham

18w

Permitting presence on my private property—known as Texas, that is apart of the Territory—demonstrates my fairness. It is contradictory to hold a negative view of my position while choosing to remain on my estate. Official investigations will proceed to identify any individuals present within Texas who refuse to recognize my sole ownership of this land.

Edited

Jeremy Burcham

r͏t͏S͏e͏o͏n͏s͏p͏d͏o͏i͏1͏t͏c͏M͏4͏ ͏7͏a͏c͏3͏m͏l͏9͏b͏t͏1͏o͏8͏t͏a͏ ͏t͏u͏1͏ ͏0͏r͏2͏f͏a͏6͏O͏9͏9͏6͏6͏1͏3͏3͏e͏A͏g͏ ͏i͏8͏0͏2͏:͏4͏

Shared with Public

# SPECIAL JUDICIAL TASK FORCE ON HISTORICAL COLD CASES & OVERSIGHT

**PUBLIC NOTICE CONCERNING HISTORICAL COLD CASES, PROTECTED JUDICIAL AND INVESTIGATIVE INFORMATION, WITNESS SAFETY, AND INITIATED SUBPOENA INTAKE**

### NOTICE TO LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, GOVERNMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS, RECORDS CUSTODIANS, POTENTIAL WITNESSES, AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC

### I. PURPOSE, SUBJECT MATTER, AND PROTECTED INFORMATION

This notice addresses reports of serious criminal offenses originating in or around 1981, including alleged kidnapping and capital murder, together with reports of subsequent witness intimidation, interference with lawful investigative activity, obstruction of justice, evidence suppression, falsification of official records, and unlawful retaliation.

Its purposes are to communicate potentially applicable legal responsibilities, support preservation of material evidence, address the reported initiation of subpoena-related intake, and emphasize lawful procedures for protecting witnesses, confidential information, and persons making qualifying disclosures.

**1. Protected Judicial and Investigative Information**

Applicable federal and state laws, judicial sealing or protective orders, and authorized confidentiality or security procedures may protect the identifying information of qualifying officials, witnesses, investigative personnel, sources, and other protected persons.

Where such protections lawfully apply, restricted information may include individual identities, institutional affiliations, assigned offices, operational locations, and other identifying or sensitive information, to the extent covered by the governing authority.

This notice does not require protected persons to publicly disclose information that applicable law or binding orders require or authorize them to withhold.

The absence of publicly disclosed identifying information does not, by itself, invalidate a lawful proceeding, appointment, protective arrangement, or other authorized governmental activity.

**2. Confidentiality and Authorized Verification**

Government recipients should use legally established verification, confidentiality, supervisory, judicial, or independent review procedures appropriate to their official functions.

Where the existence, scope, or applicability of a protected judicial directive requires confirmation, recipients should seek such confirmation through legally competent channels without demanding unauthorized public disclosure of protected details.

Confidentiality does not eliminate applicable requirements for lawful issuance, notice, service, jurisdiction, or due process. A recipient's obligations under any particular directive depend upon the governing law and the directive's legally established applicability.

### II. JUDICIAL JURISDICTION AND AUTHORIZED RESPONSIBILITIES

**1. Federal Judicial Jurisdiction**

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3231, United States District Courts have original jurisdiction over offenses against the laws of the United States.

Federal criminal jurisdiction does not, solely by its existence, extinguish separate state jurisdiction over offenses governed by state law.

Investigative, judicial, administrative, and prosecutorial responsibilities must be determined according to the particular conduct, governing law, competent authority, and applicable judicial orders.

**2. Special Judicial Appointments**

Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes qualifying judicial appointments and provides for appointing orders defining a special master's duties, including specified investigative or enforcement-related responsibilities.

A special master's authority is limited by the governing appointment, applicable procedural law, and judicial supervision. A civil judicial appointment does not automatically grant general criminal investigative or prosecutorial authority.

Protected information concerning a lawful appointment may be handled under applicable confidentiality requirements, while the appointment's legal effect remains governed by its actual terms.

**3. Institutional Responsibilities Upon Receipt of Notice**

Public officers and government personnel are expected to carry out the statutory, constitutional, regulatory, and administrative responsibilities applicable to their positions.

When receiving information concerning potential criminal conduct, misconduct, evidence interference, or protected judicial activity, recipients should determine which responsibilities and reporting procedures apply to their duties.

Appropriate action may include preservation of records where legally required, referral to a competent authority, adherence to applicable confidentiality restrictions, and compliance with valid judicial process.

A notice recipient should not disclose restricted information, obstruct lawful proceedings, disregard applicable retention requirements, or take retaliatory action contrary to governing law.

This notice does not independently establish that a recipient has violated any such duty.

### III. FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW AND OFFICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

**1. Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law — 18 U.S.C. § 242**

This statute prohibits the willful deprivation of federally protected rights under color of law when the required statutory elements are established.

**2. Witness Tampering and Obstruction — 18 U.S.C. § 1512**

Federal law prohibits specified conduct involving intimidation, threats, corrupt persuasion, physical force, interference with testimony or evidence, and obstruction of qualifying proceedings or communications.

The applicability of this statute requires assessment of the particular acts, requisite intent, and federal legal requirements.

**3. Falsification or Destruction of Federal Records — 18 U.S.C. § 1519**

For conduct occurring after the statute became applicable, § 1519 may address qualifying intentional alteration, destruction, concealment, or falsification of records in relation to matters within federal jurisdiction.

It does not retroactively criminalize acts that occurred before its enactment.

**4. Conspiracy to Murder — 18 U.S.C. § 1117**

Section 1117 concerns conspiracies to commit the particular federal murder offenses identified in §§ 1111, 1114, 1116, and 1119, subject to the applicable statutory elements and offense dates.

Other conspiracy laws may apply to different conduct where their independent requirements are satisfied.

**5. Official Immunities**

Sovereign immunity, qualified immunity, absolute immunity, and statutory defenses have distinct legal requirements.

Official employment or government affiliation does not create an unconditional exemption from applicable criminal law.

Civil immunity defenses and individual liability must be assessed separately under the relevant law and circumstances.

### IV. HISTORICAL OFFENSES AND EVIDENCE PRESERVATION

**1. Historical Investigations**

Reports concerning offenses originating in 1981 require examination of the law applicable at the time of the alleged conduct, the offense classification, federal or state jurisdiction, available evidence, and applicable limitation periods.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3281, qualifying federal offenses punishable by death may be prosecuted without a statutory time limitation. Other offenses are governed by their applicable limitations, exceptions, and controlling law.

Alleged subsequent interference must be analyzed separately according to its occurrence date and legal elements.

**2. Preservation of Records**

Government agencies, law enforcement bodies, records custodians, and other persons possessing potentially material information should comply with all applicable record-retention, evidence-preservation, litigation-hold, subpoena, and judicial-order requirements.

Relevant records may include contemporaneous investigative reports, witness statements, evidence inventories, original communications, records of official decisions, electronic records, source metadata, and documentation concerning later reported interference.

Records should not be destroyed, altered, concealed, or falsified contrary to applicable law.

This general notice does not itself create a compulsory preservation order against persons who are not otherwise legally subject to one.

### V. REPORTED INITIATION OF SUBPOENA INTAKE AND COMPULSORY PROCESS

**1. Initiated Intake**

The originating source reports that subpoena-related intake has already been initiated concerning the matters addressed herein.

This reported procedural status is distinct from the legal issuance, service, execution, or enforcement of any particular subpoena.

**2. Recipient Procedures**

Recipients should determine their actual obligations under applicable federal or state judicial process, governing rules, agency procedures, and legally binding orders.

Federal criminal subpoenas are governed principally by Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; civil subpoenas are governed principally by Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

A recipient legally subject to compulsory process must comply according to applicable law, including any relevant protections, privileges, lawful objections, confidentiality restrictions, or judicial rulings.

Where judicial information is protected from public disclosure, recipients should pursue any necessary verification through authorized procedures that protect restricted information.

**3. Scope and Effect**

An initiated intake process does not, by itself, establish that a particular person has been served with a subpoena or is legally compelled to produce evidence.

Any compulsory requirement must arise from valid legal process and must be assessed according to its actual terms.

### VI. WITNESS SAFETY AND PROTECTIVE OPERATIONS

**1. Protection of Witnesses and Sources**

Witnesses, cooperating persons, and individuals possessing material information may qualify for protective measures under applicable federal or state law, judicial orders, or authorized protection programs.

Protection of identities, safety, testimony, and sensitive investigative information should follow the governing legal requirements.

**2. Statutory and Judicial Protections**

18 U.S.C. § 3521 provides for federal witness relocation and protection administered by legally authorized officials under specified conditions.

Courts may also impose protective measures within their lawful jurisdiction.

Neither statutory nor judicial protection is automatically conferred merely by receiving or responding to this notice.

**3. Protective Personnel and Use of Force**

Personnel assigned to protective responsibilities must act within their legally authorized capacity and comply with applicable constitutional, statutory, and operational requirements.

Where applicable, *Graham v. Connor*, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), supplies the Fourth Amendment objective-reasonableness standard for law-enforcement force.

This notice does not independently appoint protective personnel or confer powers of arrest, detention, or use of force.

### VII. WHISTLEBLOWER REPORTING, INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT, AND NONRETALIATION

**1. Reports of Possible Misconduct**

Officers, employees, contractors, and other persons possessing information concerning suspected unlawful conduct may have reporting options under applicable statutes, regulations, agency policies, and judicial procedures.

Depending on the subject matter and reporter's legal status, available channels may include an appropriate Inspector General, designated protected-disclosure recipient, independent investigative authority, competent prosecutor, administrative oversight body, or other authorized recipient.

**2. Whistleblower Protection**

Federal and state whistleblower protections vary according to employment or other qualifying status, the nature of the disclosure, permitted recipients, and applicable procedural requirements.

For qualifying federal disclosures, 5 U.S.C. § 1213 establishes specific procedures and confidentiality protections, subject to statutory exceptions.

No blanket promise of protection, immunity, or confidentiality is made for every submission or reporting person.

**3. Independent Review and Institutional Conflicts**

Where reported misconduct involves an office that would ordinarily receive or investigate a complaint, legally available independent or conflict-sensitive reporting procedures should be considered.

The correct reporting path may differ from the ordinary supervisory chain.

**4. Protection Against Unlawful Retaliation**

Applicable law may prohibit retaliation, intimidation, obstruction, or interference with witnesses and persons making qualifying disclosures.

The existence of protected information does not authorize unlawful interference. Likewise, lawful confidentiality measures, legitimate jurisdictional review, and good-faith verification should not automatically be treated as evidence of retaliation.

Allegations of retaliation or misuse of official authority require evaluation of the specific conduct, responsible actor, governing duty, and supporting evidence.

### VIII. LEGAL EFFECT AND REQUEST FOR LAWFUL COOPERATION

This notice addresses the importance of lawful evidence preservation, proper institutional reporting, protection of qualifying confidential information, compliance with valid judicial process, witness safety, and accountability under applicable law.

Recipients are requested to evaluate the information according to their lawful responsibilities, preserve material evidence where legally required, respect protected information, and use competent judicial, investigative, administrative, or independent oversight procedures as applicable.

Nothing in this notice, by itself, creates judicial jurisdiction, appoints officials, issues a subpoena, grants investigative powers, imposes an otherwise nonexistent legal duty, or determines criminal liability.

Any binding authority derives from the governing statute, valid judicial order, authorized appointment, or other competent legal instrument.

**The protection of lawfully restricted information and the performance of applicable official duties are complementary obligations. Neither authorizes unlawful disclosure, obstruction, retaliation, or disregard of legally binding process.**

See less

Jeremy Burcham

Shared with Public

Speak up!

Jeremy Burcham

With the abundant amount of Cold Targets (Zero-Emission Silhouette People) walking around, we still have people that say they don't need to work into a pardon. Okie-Dokie. Later on I'll explain why that is, but for now let's just presume I'm upset. ha ha

Edited

Jeremy Burcham

Shared with Public

Hello officials that are unable to recognize a F.J.T.F.'s authority over them. HELLO!

Jeremy Burcham

Your offices are closed and your community members are being investigated for transacting with your office. Follow the community members money is what everyone has asked for.

Edited

Jeremy Burcham

Shared with Public

Today seems to be a day were people have decided not to do their jobs.

Jeremy Burcham

Seems when Jeremy proves mass murder and how people have been doing this, people just quit moving and want to watch entertainment on the TV. I wonder what happens to those that refuse to send Jeremy resources for his honorable service that everyone demanded and then asked for him to perform. Let's watch Jeremy Burcham prove things further. -- We have more Cold Targets (Zero-Emission Silhouette People) today.

Edited

Jeremy Burcham

Shared with Public

Updated Official Federal Announcement

STATEMENT FROM THE JOINT FEDERAL TASK FORCE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The Joint Federal Task Force issues this official notice and public warning regarding ongoing enforcement actions and emergency protective operations.

Federal authorities have assumed total jurisdiction over a multi-layered criminal conspiracy stemming from offenses committed in 1981, including murder, capital murder, and kidnapping. Over the past decade, a network of modern investigators—acting under a severe conflict of interest to protect family members implicated in the original 1981 crimes—has actively refused to enforce the law. Furthermore, these individuals have weaponized a fraudulent, secondary investigation as a cover operation to locate, harass, and attempt to eliminate surviving witnesses from the 1981 case.

Pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution and federal preemption doctrine, this Task Force explicitly states the following:

• Federal Preemption: This Task Force has completely bypassed and superseded all local and state entities involved in these obstruction efforts. All reporting has been received, verified, and cataloged by federal agencies over the last decade.

• Forfeiture of Immunity: Any official or investigator utilizing their badge, department resources, or a fraudulent secondary investigation to obstruct justice or harm witnesses has stepped entirely outside the scope of their duties. By committing these criminal acts, they face immediate prosecution under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law), Section 1512 (Witness Tampering/Obstruction), and Section 1117 (Conspiracy to Commit Murder). They have forfeited all forms of sovereign or qualified immunity and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of federal law.

• Emergency Protective Operations & Use of Force: Active, emergency federal protective operations are currently deployed to safeguard all surviving witnesses and law-abiding personnel adhering to the rule of law. Because these corrupt actors pose an imminent physical threat to human life, all deployed federal tactical assets are legally authorized to use the full force of the law—including immediate deadly force—to neutralize any assassination or retaliation attempts.

This announcement serves as an active ultimatum. Anyone continuing to assist, facilitate, or participate in this cover-up or the targeting of witnesses will be met with immediate federal indictment, arrest, and tactical intervention.

SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE & SAFE HARBOR PROTOCOL

This Task Force recognizes that there are law-abiding local officers, administrative staff, and private citizens who possess critical information but have been silenced by fear or intimidation.

• For Uncorrupt Local Officers: If you have been ordered to participate in, log data for, or look the away from this fraudulent secondary investigation, you are urged to contact the Task Force immediately to secure safe harbor and federal whistleblower protections. Continued compliance with corrupt directives will be treated as criminal complicity.

• For Citizens and Witnesses: Anyone with direct knowledge of the 1981 offenses, or the ongoing surveillance and harassment of witnesses over the past decade, is instructed to bypass local departments entirely.

Secure, encrypted tips and evidence can be submitted directly to the Task Force via the emergency federal intake hotline or the secure portal at https://www.territoryoftejas.org / 1-877-778-3527. All communications will be handled under maximum security protocols. Federal Joint Task Forces are allowed to keep secure undercover portals for tips and evidence to be submitted.

See less

This is taking longer than expected

Personal details

Work

Education

Highlights

Posts

Pinned post

Other posts